
Large agricultural firms have enough influence in the food industry to squeeze out smaller farmers by not offering fair prices for their products.
By Rich Bindell From food&waterwatch
Over the past few weeks, as we’ve been preparing for our Sowing the Seeds events, some interesting discussions have been brewing about city mice vs. country mice and how they relate to agricultural subsidies. We think this issue will be a hot topic in the months to come and understanding it is critical to the success of the next Farm Bill, so we wanted to add our two cents to the discussion, as well.
It began with Washington Post writer Ezra Klein’s blog post, “Why We Still Need Cities,” which included a brash comment about subsidies. U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack wasn’t happy with Klein’s comments about rural life, so he requested a chance to respond. A second post followed in the form of a Klein interview with Vilsack where the Ag chief defends the culture of rural life and its denizens’ contributions to the nation. Our thoughts on their exchange? Klein: wrong; Vilsack: wrong. They both seemed to talk around the real issue. Monica Potts from American Prospect and Grist’s Tom Philpott both have a similar opinion.
![[rss]](http://healthandsociety.com/wp-content/themes/k2_1.0.3/images/feed.png)


